Invalid Resource ID Error

integrationActiveStable

The script encounters an 'Invalid Resource ID' error when using variables, indicating issues with variable resolution in the Azure CLI context.

Opportunity Score (Heuristic (unvalidated)):69 · High · heuristic
First seen: 8/21/2023
Last seen: 10/17/2026

Score Breakdown

Heuristic ranking from public discussion signals — not a validated prediction of commercial opportunity, demand, or willingness to pay.

Composite 69/100 (High, unvalidated). Top driver: Willingness to pay (30% weight, 19.5 pts).

Frequency · 25% · 17 pts · XPS relevance68

Heuristic only — often urgency map or random scaffolding on ingest, not measured mention frequency. Maps to XPS relevance (with market size).

Severity · 25% · 18.8 pts · XPS quality75

LLM/mock judgment of intensity from title/summary text — not ops or ticket data. Maps to XPS quality (with willingness to pay).

Willingness to pay · 30% · 19.5 pts · XPS quality65

LLM/mock purchase-intent guess from text — not invoices, surveys, or paid seats. Maps to XPS quality.

Trend · 10% · 5.9 pts · XPS novelty59

Heuristic/scaffold (often random or fixed on insert) — not a verified mention trajectory. Maps to XPS novelty.

Market size · 10% · 7.8 pts · XPS relevance78

Heuristic/scaffold (often random or fixed) — not TAM research. Maps to XPS relevance (with frequency).

Catalog notes (not predictive analysis)

Invalid Resource ID Error (integration). Catalog heuristic opportunity score: 69/100 — a chosen formula over discussion-signal facets, not evidence of demand, conversion, or willingness to pay. Treat as browsing rank, not a commercial prediction.

The script encounters an 'Invalid Resource ID' error when using variables, indicating issues with variable resolution in the Azure CLI context.

Source Examples

azure/azure-cli Issues·Aug 21, 2023
“bash vars corrupt in WSL2 ### Describe the bug Disclaimer: This might be a problem with WSL2 and not az cli... I have a bash script that runs perfectly fine in Cloud Shell / bash. On my local win 11 with WSL2 (Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS) it fails. Code extract: ``` keyVaultId=$(az keyvault list --resource-group ${commonRg} --query '[].[id]' --output tsv) echo "KV: ${keyVaultId}" snetRef=$(az network vnet subnet show -g ${networkRg} -n ${protectedSnet} --vnet-name "${vnet}" --query '[id]' --output tsv) echo "SNET: ${snetRef}" az network private-endpoint create --connection-name "$keyvaultPepName" --name "${keyvaultPepName}" --subnet ${snetRef} --private-connection-resource-id ${keyVaultId} --resource-group "${operationRg}" --group-id vault ``` If I replace the two vars **`snetRef`** and **`keyVaultId`** with the hardcoded, fully qualified paths echo'ed in the script above; the script works in WSL2.... Note on error message: The message seems to be chopped - what I've enclosed here is the actual output, except for subscription Id is removed. ### Related command n/a ### Errors is not a valid resource ID.subscriptions/<subscr-uuid-removed>/resourceGroups/npp-common-uat-rg/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/npp-common-uat-kv Code: InvalidResourceId is not a valid resource ID.ns/<subscr-uuid-removed>/resourceGroups/npp-common-uat-rg/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/npp-common-uat-kv ### Issue script & Debug output emsal.telemetry: Generate or reuse correlation_id: ddacd7e8-a1f3-4c30-8599-a803fa50655c cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: Request URL: 'https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/<subscrId>/resourceGroups/npp-operation-uat-dr-rg/providers/Microsoft.Network/privateEndpoints/nppu-common-uat-norw-keyvault-pep?api-version=2022-01-01' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: Request method: 'PUT' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: Request headers: cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Content-Type': 'application/json' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Accept': 'application/json' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Content-Length': '552' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'x-ms-client-request-id': '7c4dcaa6-4017-11ee-a208-70a8d35938dd' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'CommandName': 'network private-endpoint create' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'ParameterSetName': '--connection-name --name --subnet --private-connection-resource-id --resource-group --group-id --debug' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'User-Agent': 'AZURECLI/2.51.0 (AAZ) azsdk-python-core/1.26.0 Python/3.10.10 (Windows-10-10.0.22621-SP0)' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Authorization': '*****' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: Request body: cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: {"location": "norwaywest", "properties": {"privateLinkServiceConnections": [{"name": "nppu-common-uat-norw-keyvault-pep", "properties": {"groupIds": ["vault"], "privateLinkServiceId": "/subscriptions/<subscrId>/resourceGroups/npp-common-uat-rg/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/npp-common-uat-kv\r"}}], "subnet": {"id": "/subscriptions/<subscrId>/resourceGroups/networking-uat-rg/providers/Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks/my-vnet/subnets/the-snet\r"}}} urllib3.connectionpool: Starting new HTTPS connection (1): management.azure.com:443 urllib3.connectionpool: https://management.azure.com:443 "PUT /subscriptions/<subscrId>/resourceGroups/npp-operation-uat-dr-rg/providers/Microsoft.Network/privateEndpoints/nppu-common-uat-norw-keyvault-pep?api-version=2022-01-01 HTTP/1.1" 400 271 cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: Response status: 400 cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: Response headers: cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Cache-Control': 'no-cache' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Pragma': 'no-cache' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Content-Length': '271' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Content-Type': 'application/json; charset=utf-8' cli.azure.cli.core.sdk.policies: 'Expires': '-1' cli.azure.”
— FairW↗

Competitive Landscape

  • Existing solutions are either too expensive or too limited
  • Most competitors target enterprise, leaving mid-market underserved
  • Community scripts and manual processes are the primary alternative

Recommended Next Steps

  1. ✓Validate pain intensity with 5-10 target customer interviews
  2. ✓Build minimal viable solution addressing the core workflow
  3. ✓Test pricing with early adopters from community forums

Related Pain Points

Target Customers

  • IT teams at mid-size organizations (100-2000 employees)
  • MSPs and consultants managing multiple client environments
  • Teams without dedicated specialist staff for this domain

Monetization Ideas

  1. 1SaaS subscription model ($99-$499/month depending on scale)
  2. 2Usage-based pricing aligned with value delivered
  3. 3Freemium tier to drive adoption and prove value